According to the tradition among Muslim society in Indonesia, males and females should be circumcised.
For the males, circumcision is carried out when he is between 4 to 9 years old, by cutting a small piece of skin that cover the upper part of a penis.
While for females, circumcision is carried out when she was still few days old, with a prick of a needle on the upper part of her clitoris.
And circumcision could only be done based on the consent of the child's parents.
http://www.indonesiamatters.com/1626/fgm/
Female Genital Mutilation
March 3rd, 2008, in News & Issues, by Patung
Foreign efforts to eradicate female genital mutilation.
United Nations
On February 27th ten United Nations agencies pledged to engage in a renewed effort to eliminate female genital mutilation (FGM), or female circumcision, within a generation.
UN Deputy Secretary General Asha-Rose Migiro said:
If we can come together for a sustained push, female genital mutilation can vanish within a generation.
In Indonesia only the populist press seemed to take an interest in the story with a Surya headline screaming "The United Nations Bans Female Circumcision": [1]
MUI
Prof Dr Chuzaimah T Yanggo, the head of the Youth and Women's section of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI), said of the United Nations:
What do they think they're doing, it's not their business. Religion cannot be interfered with by men.
He She said the Health Department had already agreed with the MUI that there was a right way, and several wrong ways, to carry out "khitan". The right way was to "open" the "upper part", the clitoris, a little, by making a small cut, while the wrong ways involved cutting off the whole organ or making substantial cuts, and these were forbidden.
Chuzaimah said the UN was confused about circumcision because it heard stories from Africa, where the practice was more extreme.
Java
Meanwhile the East Java secretary of the MUI, Prof Dr Hj Istibjaroh, said female circumcision was neither required nor forbidden but:
In general it is done.
The purpose was to reduce the sex drive of women, he said, while the purpose of male circumcision was to increase sex drive.
FGM
April 2006, Bandung. [2]
He said among the women's wing of the Nahdlatul Ulama, the Muslimat NU, female circumcision was something thought not worth debating.
Endang Sri of the Indonesian Midwives Association (Ikatan Bidan Indonesia (IBI)) in Surabaya, East Java, said however that the practice was not allowed.
When parents requested it the IBI simply performed a washing of the area. She said requests to have girls circumcised in Surabaya were rare these days, and came mainly from the northern part of the city, presumably from ethnic Madurese people. [3]
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/24/BAFF19D286.DTL
Genital mutilation grounds for asylum bid
Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
(08-24) 16:37 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- A Northern California family whose daughter underwent forced circumcision in Indonesia is entitled to seek political asylum in the United States, a federal appeals court said Monday.
________________________________________
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco criticized immigration officials who, in ordering the family deported, decided that the girl had suffered no serious harm when her genitals were mutilated as a newborn.
Any form of female genital mutilation is "horrifically brutal" and amounts to persecution under established precedents in federal courts and the Justice Department's immigration courts, the court said.
The 3-0 ruling gives Bob Benito Benyamin, his wife, Anabella Rodriguez, and their three daughters another chance to challenge deportation to Indonesia, where the oldest daughter underwent forced circumcision at 5 days old in 1992 at the orders of a grandmother. The family said she has felt pain from the procedure ever since.
The family entered the United States legally in 1999 and applied for asylum in 2002 after Benyamin's business visa expired. They live in the Sacramento area, their lawyer said.
Federal courts have granted asylum to women who fled their countries after being genitally mutilated or threatened with mutilation. In this case, the parents argued that one of their younger daughters would face ritual mutilation if deported to Indonesia, and that sparing her from deportation would be meaningless if the rest of her family was deported.
In denying asylum, immigration judges cited a State Department report that said female genital mutilation as practiced in Indonesia "involves minimal short-term pain, suffering and complications."
Contrasting the procedure to a court's description of mutilation in Ethiopia, where the genitals are cut with knives and recovery takes 40 days, immigration courts said the Indonesian girl had not been persecuted and that neither she nor her family was entitled to asylum.
But the appeals court said its rulings and a World Health Organization report have found that even in its least drastic form, the genital mutilation of women and girls causes physical and psychological harm and the risk of serious complications.
An immigration review board's "attempt to parse the distinction between differing forms of female genital mutilation is ... a threat to the rights of women in a civilized society," Judge Margaret McKeown said in the court ruling.
The court returned the case to the immigration board to decide whether the younger daughter faced a likelihood of genital mutilation in Indonesia. If so, the board must decide whether the entire family is eligible for asylum or whether the parents and their daughters might instead be sent to Venezuela, the mother's native country. The younger daughter was born there.
Robert Ryan, an attorney in San Francisco who represents the family, said the court had corrected a series of legal errors by the immigration judges, including their downplaying of the older daughter's trauma.
"There's no such thing as mild female genital mutilation," he said.
http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_13194813?nclick_check=1
SF federal appeals court orders reconsideration of mutilation asylum case
Associated Press
Posted: 08/24/2009 04:02:30 PM PDT
Updated: 08/24/2009 04:02:30 PM PDT
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal court is ordering the U.S. government to reconsider the asylum claim of an Indonesian man whose daughter suffered female genital mutilation as an infant while still at the hospital.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco rejected Monday the Bureau of Immigration Appeal's denial of the application Bob Benito Benyamin submitted for himself and his family.
The three-judge panel rejected the BIA's reasoning that female circumcision as practiced in Indonesia is of a "less extreme variety."
Benyamin is a Muslim married to a Catholic. Their daughter underwent the mutilation when she was five days old, without her parents' consent. The couple have another daughter. They fear for her safety, and they fear persecution for being a mixed-religion household.